Sunday, 13 November 2016

The school research lead and analysing your school's readiness for innovation.

Many school-based interventions fail because they are introduced at too large a scale.  Interventions or innovations which might well have worked if they been developed in a small-pilot, get rolled out into school with insufficient thought given to the know-how, capacity and staff commitment available to support the intervention.   In this post I draw upon the work of Bryk et al (2015) to help school research leads advise senior leaders within a school about the appropriate scale of implementation when introducing a new intervention within a school.

Sizing up the context

Bryk et al (2015) argue that one of the many reasons why many educational interventions/innovations fails is that insufficient thought is given to the organisational context into which the intervention is to be introduced.  So to help school leaders and others improve their abilities to understand their context better they have developed an organisation framework based on three core critiera.
  1. What is the existing level of know-how about the intervention?  So what does the research say about this intervention, do we know what works, why, for who, and in what context
  2. What is the school's capacity and capability to cope with the intervention? Do staff have sufficient time, opportunity and skills to bring about meaningful changes in their practice.
  3. Engagement to what extent are participants - predominantly teachers - in favour of the intervention. In other words, how willing are teachers do what is necessary to make the innovation work.
Now depending upon how these three 'variables' playout, this will suggest the level of implementation which is right for that school's context.  So it may be there is little know-how, capacity/capability and commitment towards the intervention, so this may mean either the intervention is abandoned or a small number of volunteers are sought.  On the other hand, there may well be extensive know-how on how to make something work, sufficient resources to support the implementation, and wide-scale teacher commitment to the intervention, which might justify a whole-school roll-out.  And of course, there may be levels of intervention which lie in between these two extremes - such as departmental, year group or key stage.

Bryk et al summarise the above in the following table.
























Implications for school research leads and school leadership teams.

Bryk et al identify a number of both principles and valued goals which are supported by this approach.

General Principles
  1. Wherever possible, learn quickly and cheaply
  2. Be minimally intrusive - some changes will fail, and we want to limit negative consequences on individuals' time and personal lives; and
  3. Develop empirical evidence at every step to guide subsequent principles.
Valued Goals
  1. Through small tests of change, we develop the technical knowledge to turn a good idea into something that can be actually executed effectively.
  2. We build capabilities among the individuals involved in the early testing.  The practical expertise they develop through working out a set of change ideas become an invaluable resource to coach others as they learn to do the same
  3. As early adopters experience heightened efficiency in their day-to-day or, they also become champions for these changes to be taken up by others. (p120)

Some final words

As Bryk et al argue not every school based innovation has to start out as a very-small or  small-scale intervention.  If the correct conditions are in place re know-how, resources (human, physical and financial) and commitment then whole school implementation may well be appropriate.  On the other hand, more often than not, an analysis of the context of the school will suggest either a very-small or small-scale pilot.


Reference

BRYK, A. S., GOMEZ, L. M., GRUNOW, A. & LEMAHIEU, P. G. 2015. Learning to improve: How America's schools can get better at getting better. p120

11 comments:

  1. Planning is important in every phase of life, and it goes the same for studying too.
    Best Schools in Vijayanagar|Best CBSE schools in Rajarajeshwari Nagar

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wonderful post. The practical activities have great "educational" potential. Mostly the classroom teaching is theoretical. Practical knowledge can be given to the kids through outdoor or indoor activities that interest kids. http://www.kidsfront.com/learn_with_fun.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The possible values would help students initiating with all those provisions of ideas which one must needed to occupy. gre waiver letter

    ReplyDelete
  5. People who are thinking of becoming psychiatrists should prepare from the very beginning and know that, writing psychiatry personal statement is never an easy task. personal statement psychology

    ReplyDelete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. If you have got unhealthy interview skills all of the intellect that you just have can go unperceived. There ar sure aspects of Associate in Nursing interview that we have a tendency to don't consider before going in the workplace. employment interview recommendation may be a good way to urge perceptive recommendations on your presentation and resume. msw personal statement

    ReplyDelete
  9. Cardiologists ar medical physicians specifically trained in identification and treating disorders of the center or system. Common areas of identification and treatment could embrace inherent defects, artery illness, cardiopathy, heart valve disorders,  sports medicine personal statement

    ReplyDelete
  10. After chatting with many students, parents, admissions officers, and counselors, I've compiled some tips which will facilitate families through this typically nerve-racking time. click here

    ReplyDelete